Home Supplements How We Rate Blog
Pfaffia paniculata

Suma Root

Research reviewed: Up until 03/2026

Suma Root (Pfaffia paniculata) is a dietary supplement with 5 published peer-reviewed studies involving 98 participants, researched for Adaptogenic & Athletic Performance, Immune Function, Mechanistic & Animal Studies.

5
Studies
98
Participants
2003–2020
Research Span

Evidence at a Glance

Strength is scored by study design, sample size, study type, and outcomes

Overall: Moderate Evidence

Adaptogenic & Athletic Performance

Moderate
2 studies 1 of 2 positive 68 participants

Immune Function

Moderate
1 study 0 of 1 positive 30 participants

Mechanistic & Animal Studies

Weak
2 studies 0 of 2 positive 0 participants 0 human

Research Visualised

Visual breakdown of the clinical data.

Study Quality Breakdown

What types of studies were conducted

2/5
Randomised
1/5
Double-Blind
1/5
Placebo-Controlled

Participants Per Study

Larger samples = more reliable results

Study 1 (2014)
40
Study 2 (2003)
28
Study 3 (2015)
30
Study 4 (2009)
0
Study 5 (2020)
0

Research Timeline

When the studies were published

1
2003
1
2009
1
2014
1
2015
1
2020

All Studies

Detailed breakdown of each trial. Click to expand.

Adaptogenic & Athletic Performance

1

To evaluate Suma root extract on endurance performance and fatigue in athletes

2014 40 participants 8 weeks 500 mg/day Suma root extract
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To evaluate Suma root extract on endurance performance and fatigue in athletes

Dose

500 mg/day Suma root extract

Participants

40 male soccer players

Duration

8 weeks

Results

Significant improvement in time to exhaustion (p=0.04) and VO2 max trend. Subjective fatigue reduced. Cortisol levels lower post-exercise. Adaptogenic properties suggest stress-buffering mechanism.

How They Measured It

VO2 max, time to exhaustion, fatigue VAS, cortisol

Read full study
2

To evaluate Suma root on hormonal markers and body composition

2003 28 participants 6 weeks 250-500 mg/day Suma extract
Human Study RCT Mixed

Study Type

Randomised, controlled pilot

Purpose

To evaluate Suma root on hormonal markers and body composition

Dose

250-500 mg/day Suma extract

Participants

28 trained athletes

Duration

6 weeks

Results

Testosterone and DHEA-S trended higher in Suma group. Cortisol rise during training blunted. Lean body mass increased more than control. Hormonal adaptogen effects observed.

How They Measured It

Testosterone, DHEA-S, cortisol, lean body mass

Read full study

Immune Function

3

To assess Suma root on immune function markers in healthy adults

2015 30 participants 6 weeks 500 mg/day Suma root
Human Study Mixed

Study Type

Open-label controlled study

Purpose

To assess Suma root on immune function markers in healthy adults

Dose

500 mg/day Suma root

Participants

30 healthy adults

Duration

6 weeks

Results

Trends toward improved NK cell activity and lymphocyte counts vs control. IgG levels increased. IL-2 production improved. Immunomodulatory effects observed.

How They Measured It

NK cell activity, lymphocyte counts, IL-2, IgG

Read full study

Mechanistic & Animal Studies

4

To investigate beta-ecdysone from Suma root on anabolic and anti-stress properties

2009 ? participants Various Equivalent 300 mg/kg Suma extract
Animal Study Mixed

Study Type

Animal study

Purpose

To investigate beta-ecdysone from Suma root on anabolic and anti-stress properties

Dose

Equivalent 300 mg/kg Suma extract

Participants

Animal models

Duration

Various

Results

Suma extracts enhanced muscle protein synthesis and reduced markers of stress. Ecdysterones from Suma promoted anabolic signalling via non-androgenic mechanisms. Translational human studies needed.

How They Measured It

Muscle protein synthesis, cortisol, anabolic markers

Read full study
5

To summarize available evidence for Pfaffia paniculata (Suma root) health claims

2020 ? participants Various Various
Review/Other Mixed

Study Type

Systematic review

Purpose

To summarize available evidence for Pfaffia paniculata (Suma root) health claims

Dose

Various

Participants

Systematic review

Duration

Various

Results

Limited but emerging evidence for adaptogenic and immunostimulant effects. Ecdysterone content likely responsible for anabolic properties. Human clinical evidence sparse. Traditional use in Brazil well-documented.

How They Measured It

Systematic review of human, animal and in vitro studies

Read full study

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Suma Root research

What does the research say about Suma Root?

There are currently 5 peer-reviewed studies on Suma Root (Pfaffia paniculata), involving 98 total participants. Research covers Athletic performance, Adaptogenic, Immune function and 1 more areas. The overall evidence strength is rated as Moderate.

How strong is the evidence for Suma Root?

The evidence is currently rated as "Moderate Evidence". This rating is based on study design quality (randomisation, blinding, placebo controls), sample sizes, study types (3 human studies, 1 animal study), and reported outcomes.

What health goals has Suma Root been studied for?

Suma Root has been researched for: Athletic performance, Adaptogenic, Immune function, Energy & vitality. Each area has its own body of evidence which you can explore in the study breakdowns above.

Are the studies on Suma Root based on human trials?

Yes, 3 out of 5 studies are human trials. The remaining 1 is an animal study. Human trials carry more weight in our evidence scoring system.