Home Supplements How We Rate Blog
Lactobacillus acidophilus

Lactobacillus acidophilus

Research reviewed: Up until 03/2026

Lactobacillus acidophilus is a dietary supplement with 8 published peer-reviewed studies involving 903 participants, researched for Gut Health & IBS, Diarrhea Prevention, Immune Support.

8
Studies
903
Participants
2006–2014
Research Span

Evidence at a Glance

Strength is scored by study design, sample size, study type, and outcomes

Overall: Strong Evidence

Gut Health & IBS

Strong
3 studies 3 of 3 positive 139 participants 2 human

Diarrhea Prevention

Strong
3 studies 3 of 3 positive 352 participants 2 human

Immune Support

Strong
2 studies 2 of 2 positive 412 participants

Research Visualised

Visual breakdown of the clinical data.

Study Quality Breakdown

What types of studies were conducted

5/8
Randomised
4/8
Double-Blind
4/8
Placebo-Controlled

Participants Per Study

Larger samples = more reliable results

Study 1 (2006)
60
Study 2 (2007)
74
Study 3 (2014)
5
Study 1 (2008)
202
Study 2 (2007)
12
Study 3 (2012)
138
Study 1 (2014)
326
Study 2 (2009)
86

Research Timeline

When the studies were published

1
2006
2
2007
1
2008
1
2009
1
2012
2
2014

All Studies

Detailed breakdown of each trial. Click to expand.

Gut Health & IBS

1

To evaluate the efficacy of L. acidophilus in reducing IBS symptoms.

2006 60 participants 8 weeks 10 billion CFU/day
Human Study Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of L. acidophilus in reducing IBS symptoms.

Dose

10 billion CFU/day

Participants

60 patients with IBS

Duration

8 weeks

Results

L. acidophilus significantly reduced abdominal pain and bloating scores compared to placebo. Overall IBS-SSS improved by 42% in the treatment group.

How They Measured It

IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS)

Read full study
2

To assess efficacy of L. acidophilus NCFM on visceral pain sensitivity in IBS-D patients.

2007 74 participants 4 weeks 2 × 10^10 CFU/day L. acidophilus NCFM
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To assess efficacy of L. acidophilus NCFM on visceral pain sensitivity in IBS-D patients.

Dose

2 × 10^10 CFU/day L. acidophilus NCFM

Participants

74 IBS-D patients

Duration

4 weeks

Results

L. acidophilus NCFM induced expression of mu-opioid and cannabinoid receptors in intestinal epithelial cells, leading to significant increase in pain thresholds.

How They Measured It

Rectal distension pain thresholds, symptom diaries

Read full study
3

To evaluate the overall efficacy of L. acidophilus strains in IBS treatment.

2014 5 participants 4-12 weeks Various (1-20 billion CFU/day)
Review/Other Positive

Study Type

Meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the overall efficacy of L. acidophilus strains in IBS treatment.

Dose

Various (1-20 billion CFU/day)

Participants

Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs, 419 patients

Duration

4-12 weeks

Results

L. acidophilus demonstrated modest but significant improvement in overall IBS symptoms compared to placebo, with strongest effects on bloating and abdominal pain.

How They Measured It

Pooled analysis of symptom improvement across RCTs

Read full study

Diarrhea Prevention

1

To determine whether L. acidophilus prevents antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD).

2008 202 participants Duration of antibiotic course + 1 week 2 billion CFU/day
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomised controlled trial

Purpose

To determine whether L. acidophilus prevents antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD).

Dose

2 billion CFU/day

Participants

202 hospitalized patients on antibiotics

Duration

Duration of antibiotic course + 1 week

Results

L. acidophilus group had significantly lower incidence of AAD (12% vs 34% placebo). Duration of diarrhea episodes was also reduced.

How They Measured It

Incidence and duration of diarrhea episodes

Read full study
2

To evaluate probiotics including L. acidophilus for prevention of travelers' diarrhea.

2007 12 participants 1-3 weeks travel duration Various L. acidophilus strains
Review/Other Positive

Study Type

Meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate probiotics including L. acidophilus for prevention of travelers' diarrhea.

Dose

Various L. acidophilus strains

Participants

Meta-analysis of 12 RCTs, 4709 travelers

Duration

1-3 weeks travel duration

Results

L. acidophilus-containing probiotics showed a significant reduction in travelers' diarrhea risk (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91).

How They Measured It

Pooled risk ratios from included RCTs

Read full study
3

To assess L. acidophilus in prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

2012 138 participants 20 days 10 billion CFU/day
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To assess L. acidophilus in prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Dose

10 billion CFU/day

Participants

138 hospitalized elderly patients

Duration

20 days

Results

Incidence of C. difficile toxin-positive diarrhea was significantly lower in the L. acidophilus group (2.9% vs 7.3% placebo).

How They Measured It

Incidence of C. difficile toxin-positive diarrhea

Read full study

Immune Support

1

To evaluate the immunomodulatory effects of L. acidophilus supplementation.

2014 326 participants 6 months 5 billion CFU/day
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To evaluate the immunomodulatory effects of L. acidophilus supplementation.

Dose

5 billion CFU/day

Participants

326 healthy adults

Duration

6 months

Results

L. acidophilus supplementation significantly increased NK cell activity and reduced the incidence and duration of respiratory infections by 34% compared to placebo.

How They Measured It

NK cell activity, cytokine levels, incidence of respiratory infections

Read full study
2

To evaluate the effect of L. acidophilus on immune response to influenza vaccination in elderly.

2009 86 participants 13 weeks 10 billion CFU/day
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomised controlled trial

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of L. acidophilus on immune response to influenza vaccination in elderly.

Dose

10 billion CFU/day

Participants

86 elderly nursing home residents

Duration

13 weeks

Results

L. acidophilus group showed significantly higher seroconversion rates and antibody titers to influenza vaccine compared to placebo.

How They Measured It

Seroconversion rates, antibody titers

Read full study

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Lactobacillus acidophilus research

What does the research say about Lactobacillus acidophilus?

There are currently 8 peer-reviewed studies on Lactobacillus acidophilus (Lactobacillus acidophilus), involving 903 total participants. Research covers Gut health, IBS symptom relief, Immune support and 1 more areas. The overall evidence strength is rated as Strong.

How strong is the evidence for Lactobacillus acidophilus?

The evidence is currently rated as "Strong Evidence". This rating is based on study design quality (randomisation, blinding, placebo controls), sample sizes, study types (6 human studies), and reported outcomes.

What health goals has Lactobacillus acidophilus been studied for?

Lactobacillus acidophilus has been researched for: Gut health, IBS symptom relief, Immune support, Diarrhea prevention. Each area has its own body of evidence which you can explore in the study breakdowns above.

Are the studies on Lactobacillus acidophilus based on human trials?

Yes, 6 out of 8 studies are human trials. Human trials carry more weight in our evidence scoring system.