Home Supplements How We Rate Blog
β-Phenylethylamine

Phenylethylamine (PEA)

Research reviewed: 2006–2016

Phenylethylamine (PEA) (β-Phenylethylamine) is a dietary supplement with 8 published peer-reviewed studies involving 360 participants, researched for Mood & Depression, Cognitive Function & Focus, Energy & Weight Management.

8
Studies
360
Participants
2006–2016
Research Span

Evidence at a Glance

Strength is scored by study design, sample size, study type, and outcomes

Overall: Strong Evidence

Mood & Depression

Moderate
3 studies 2 of 3 positive 225 participants

Cognitive Function & Focus

Moderate
3 studies 0 of 3 positive 80 participants

Energy & Weight Management

Moderate
2 studies 1 of 2 positive 55 participants

Research Visualised

Visual breakdown of the clinical data.

Study Quality Breakdown

What types of studies were conducted

3/8
Randomised
0/8
Double-Blind
1/8
Placebo-Controlled

Participants Per Study

Larger samples = more reliable results

Study 1 (2007)
60
Study 2 (2006)
120
Study 3 (2010)
45
Study 4 (2013)
30
Study 5 (2015)
50
Study 6 (2016)
0
Study 7 (2011)
55
Study 8 (2009)
0

Research Timeline

When the studies were published

1
2006
1
2007
1
2009
1
2010
1
2011
1
2013
1
2015
1
2016

All Studies

Detailed breakdown of each trial. Click to expand.

Mood & Depression

1

Test oral PEA for antidepressant effects

2007 60 participants 4 weeks 10–60 mg/day + selegiline 10 mg
Human Study Positive

Study Type

Open-Label Clinical Study

Purpose

Test oral PEA for antidepressant effects

Dose

10–60 mg/day + selegiline 10 mg

Participants

60

Duration

4 weeks

Results

Significant reduction in HDRS scores (>50% improvement) in 60% of patients; rapid onset within 2 weeks

How They Measured It

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, BDI

Read full study
2

Measure urinary PEA as biomarker of depression

2006 120 participants Cross-sectional N/A (observational)
Human Study Positive

Study Type

Observational Study

Purpose

Measure urinary PEA as biomarker of depression

Dose

N/A (observational)

Participants

120

Duration

Cross-sectional

Results

Depressed patients had significantly lower urinary PEA vs controls; correlation with mood scores

How They Measured It

Urinary PEA measurement, depression scores

Read full study
3

Evaluate PEA on mood and energy in healthy adults

2010 45 participants 8 weeks 500 mg PEA
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomised Controlled Trial

Purpose

Evaluate PEA on mood and energy in healthy adults

Dose

500 mg PEA

Participants

45

Duration

8 weeks

Results

Significant improvements in mood and energy subscales of POMS; no significant weight change

How They Measured It

POMS, VAS energy scale, cognitive function

Read full study

Cognitive Function & Focus

4

Assess acute cognitive effects of PEA supplementation

2013 30 participants Acute 200 mg PEA
Human Study RCT Mixed

Study Type

Randomised Crossover Trial

Purpose

Assess acute cognitive effects of PEA supplementation

Dose

200 mg PEA

Participants

30

Duration

Acute

Results

PEA improved sustained attention and processing speed; improvements persisted 2 hours post-dose

How They Measured It

Stroop test, sustained attention, working memory

Read full study
5

Evaluate PEA on cognitive performance in older adults

2015 50 participants 6 weeks 250 mg/day
Human Study Placebo Positive

Study Type

Placebo-Controlled Trial

Purpose

Evaluate PEA on cognitive performance in older adults

Dose

250 mg/day

Participants

50

Duration

6 weeks

Results

Modest improvement in processing speed and attention; no significant effect on memory

How They Measured It

Trail Making Test, digit span, reaction time

Read full study
6

Review PEA receptor pharmacology and neurotransmitter interactions

2016 0 participants N/A N/A
Human Study Mixed

Study Type

Mechanistic Review

Purpose

Review PEA receptor pharmacology and neurotransmitter interactions

Dose

N/A

Participants

0

Duration

N/A

Results

PEA activates TAAR1 receptors; modulates dopamine and serotonin signalling; half-life ~5–10 minutes in plasma

How They Measured It

Literature review of TAAR1 binding and monoamine modulation

Read full study

Energy & Weight Management

7

Test PEA on energy levels and weight loss in overweight adults

2011 55 participants 8 weeks 500 mg/day
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomised Controlled Trial

Purpose

Test PEA on energy levels and weight loss in overweight adults

Dose

500 mg/day

Participants

55

Duration

8 weeks

Results

PEA group reported significantly higher energy levels; weight loss similar between groups (diet-driven)

How They Measured It

VAS energy scale, body weight, fat mass via BIA

Read full study
8

Evaluate PEA as endogenous neuromodulator and supplementation potential

2009 0 participants N/A N/A
Human Study Mixed

Study Type

Review Article

Purpose

Evaluate PEA as endogenous neuromodulator and supplementation potential

Dose

N/A

Participants

0

Duration

N/A

Results

PEA naturally produced during exercise; supplementation may mimic runner's high; evidence base moderate

How They Measured It

Narrative review of clinical and preclinical evidence

Read full study

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Phenylethylamine (PEA) research

What does the research say about Phenylethylamine (PEA)?

There are currently 8 peer-reviewed studies on Phenylethylamine (PEA) (β-Phenylethylamine), involving 360 total participants. Research covers Mood, Focus, Energy and 1 more areas. The overall evidence strength is rated as Strong.

How strong is the evidence for Phenylethylamine (PEA)?

The evidence is currently rated as "Strong Evidence". This rating is based on study design quality (randomisation, blinding, placebo controls), sample sizes, study types (8 human studies), and reported outcomes.

What health goals has Phenylethylamine (PEA) been studied for?

Phenylethylamine (PEA) has been researched for: Mood, Focus, Energy, Weight Management. Each area has its own body of evidence which you can explore in the study breakdowns above.

Are the studies on Phenylethylamine (PEA) based on human trials?

Yes, 8 out of 8 studies are human trials. Human trials carry more weight in our evidence scoring system.