Home Supplements How We Rate Blog
Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA)

Palmitoylethanolamide

Research reviewed: Up until 03/2026

Palmitoylethanolamide (Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA)) is a dietary supplement with 3 published peer-reviewed studies involving 774 participants, researched for Pain Management, Neuropathic Pain & Inflammation.

3
Studies
774
Participants
2022–2024
Research Span

Evidence at a Glance

Strength is scored by study design, sample size, study type, and outcomes

Overall: Moderate Evidence

Pain Management

Moderate
2 studies 0 of 2 positive 11 participants

Neuropathic Pain & Inflammation

Moderate
1 study 1 of 1 positive 0 participants

Research Visualised

Visual breakdown of the clinical data.

Study Quality Breakdown

What types of studies were conducted

1/3
Randomised
0/3
Double-Blind
0/3
Placebo-Controlled

Participants Per Study

Larger samples = more reliable results

Study 1 (2024)
11
Study 2 (2023)
0
Study 1 (2022)
0

Research Timeline

When the studies were published

1
2022
1
2023
1
2024

All Studies

Detailed breakdown of each trial. Click to expand.

Pain Management

1

To evaluate palmitoylethanolamide effectiveness in chronic pain management

2024 11 participants 6-26 weeks across studies Various PEA preparations (300-2000 mg/day typical)
Human Study Positive

Study Type

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate palmitoylethanolamide effectiveness in chronic pain management

Dose

Various PEA preparations (300-2000 mg/day typical)

Participants

Meta-analysis of 11 RCTs, combined 774 patients

Duration

6-26 weeks across studies

Results

Pooled analysis favored PEA over control with average pain intensity reduction of 1.68 (p=0.00001). Significant at 6, 8, and 24-26 weeks.

How They Measured It

Pain intensity reduction on standardized 11-point scale

Read full study
2

To assess palmitoylethanolamide for chronic pain in double-blind RCTs

2023 ? participants Various Various PEA doses tested
Human Study Mixed

Study Type

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To assess palmitoylethanolamide for chronic pain in double-blind RCTs

Dose

Various PEA doses tested

Participants

Meta-analysis of double-blind RCTs

Duration

Various

Results

PEA effective for all pain types: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. Safe with no major side effects attributed to PEA.

How They Measured It

Pain reduction across multiple pain types

Read full study

Neuropathic Pain & Inflammation

1

To evaluate ultra-fine powdered PEA on pain intensity and sleep quality in neuropathic pain patients

2022 ? participants 8 weeks Ultra-fine PEA powder
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Open-label randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To evaluate ultra-fine powdered PEA on pain intensity and sleep quality in neuropathic pain patients

Dose

Ultra-fine PEA powder

Participants

Patients with neuropathic pain due to carpal tunnel syndrome

Duration

8 weeks

Results

Ultra-fine PEA significantly improved pain relief and sleep quality in carpal tunnel syndrome neuropathic pain.

How They Measured It

Pain intensity, sleep quality scores

Read full study

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Palmitoylethanolamide research

What does the research say about Palmitoylethanolamide?

There are currently 9 peer-reviewed studies on Palmitoylethanolamide (Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA)), involving 774 total participants. Research covers Pain relief, Anti-inflammatory, Neuroprotection. The overall evidence strength is rated as Moderate.

How strong is the evidence for Palmitoylethanolamide?

The evidence is currently rated as "Moderate Evidence". This rating is based on study design quality (randomisation, blinding, placebo controls), sample sizes, study types (3 human studies), and reported outcomes.

What health goals has Palmitoylethanolamide been studied for?

Palmitoylethanolamide has been researched for: Pain relief, Anti-inflammatory, Neuroprotection. Each area has its own body of evidence which you can explore in the study breakdowns above.

Are the studies on Palmitoylethanolamide based on human trials?

Yes, 3 out of 9 studies are human trials. Human trials carry more weight in our evidence scoring system.