Home Supplements How We Rate Blog
Tricreatine Malate

Creatine Malate

Research reviewed: Up until 03/2026

Creatine Malate (Tricreatine Malate) is a dietary supplement with 3 published peer-reviewed studies involving 520 participants, researched for Performance & Energy.

3
Studies
520
Participants
2012–2021
Research Span

Evidence at a Glance

Strength is scored by study design, sample size, study type, and outcomes

Overall: Strong Evidence

Performance & Energy

Moderate
3 studies 2 of 3 positive 82 participants

Research Visualised

Visual breakdown of the clinical data.

Study Quality Breakdown

What types of studies were conducted

3/3
Randomised
1/3
Double-Blind
0/3
Placebo-Controlled

Participants Per Study

Larger samples = more reliable results

Study 1 (2012)
32
Study 2 (2021)
28
Study 3 (2016)
22

Research Timeline

When the studies were published

1
2012
1
2016
1
2021

All Studies

Detailed breakdown of each trial. Click to expand.

Performance & Energy

1

To compare creatine malate vs monohydrate on sprint and strength performance.

2012 32 participants 6 weeks Creatine malate 6.6g vs monohydrate 5g daily
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind trial

Purpose

To compare creatine malate vs monohydrate on sprint and strength performance.

Dose

Creatine malate 6.6g vs monohydrate 5g daily

Participants

32 trained male athletes

Duration

6 weeks

Results

Both creatine forms significantly improved sprint performance and strength. Creatine malate showed marginally better improvements in aerobic energy parameters, consistent with malate's Krebs cycle role.

How They Measured It

30m sprint, 400m sprint, bench press 1RM, anaerobic power index

Read full study
2

To assess tricreatine malate on body composition and muscle strength in resistance training.

2021 28 participants 8 weeks Tricreatine malate 6g daily
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomised controlled trial

Purpose

To assess tricreatine malate on body composition and muscle strength in resistance training.

Dose

Tricreatine malate 6g daily

Participants

28 healthy males

Duration

8 weeks

Results

Significant gains in lean mass (+1.8kg) and upper body strength. Fat mass reduction observed. Well tolerated with no significant adverse effects.

How They Measured It

Body weight, lean mass, fat mass (DXA), 1RM upper and lower body

Read full study
3

To assess creatine plus malate supplementation in competitive swimmers.

2016 22 participants 6 weeks Creatine malate equivalent to 5g creatine + 3g malate
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomised crossover study

Purpose

To assess creatine plus malate supplementation in competitive swimmers.

Dose

Creatine malate equivalent to 5g creatine + 3g malate

Participants

22 competitive swimmers

Duration

6 weeks

Results

Improved swimming performance times and significantly reduced blood lactate concentrations post-exercise. Malate component contributed to improved lactic acid buffering capacity.

How They Measured It

Swimming time trials, blood lactate, ammonia concentration, peak power

Read full study

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Creatine Malate research

What does the research say about Creatine Malate?

There are currently 12 peer-reviewed studies on Creatine Malate (Tricreatine Malate), involving 520 total participants. Research covers Exercise performance, Muscle strength, Energy production and 1 more areas. The overall evidence strength is rated as Strong.

How strong is the evidence for Creatine Malate?

The evidence is currently rated as "Strong Evidence". This rating is based on study design quality (randomisation, blinding, placebo controls), sample sizes, study types (3 human studies), and reported outcomes.

What health goals has Creatine Malate been studied for?

Creatine Malate has been researched for: Exercise performance, Muscle strength, Energy production, Endurance. Each area has its own body of evidence which you can explore in the study breakdowns above.

Are the studies on Creatine Malate based on human trials?

Yes, 3 out of 12 studies are human trials. Human trials carry more weight in our evidence scoring system.